Skip to content
Suffolk Counts — Suffolk, in numbers.Local help →

East Suffolk, in numbers

Issues and SWOT: East Suffolk

East Suffolk local authority area. Every figure carries its own date.

Strengths to build on. Pressures to address. Choices to make.

These assessments connect evidence with proposed responses. They are not ratings of council performance.

Strengths

strength

Turn completed units into lasting local jobs

The Nexus buildings are complete.

Actual tenancy and employment show whether premises are serving businesses.

Evidence

What could help →

strength

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £842 a month (August 2026) in East Suffolk council area. This is £617 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 6% in Rushmere St Andrew to 34.7% in Harbour & Normanston — a gap of 28.7 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

What could help →

Weaknesses

weakness

Improve connections along the South Seafront

The Felixstowe strategy prioritises signage, lighting and the link to Manor Terrace.

The seafront must be usable outside its busiest attractions.

Evidence

What could help →

weakness

Bring support closer to people in poor health

5.7% of people reported bad or very bad health in East Suffolk council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.9% in Rushmere St Andrew to 8.8% in Kessingland — a gap of 5.9 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

What could help →

Opportunities

opportunity

Restart the cultural quarter with a clear delivery plan

The revised Lowestoft design has planning approval.

This opens a route to construction and future community activity.

Evidence

What could help →

opportunity

Plan homes and care around an older population

27.8% of people in East Suffolk council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 16.7% in Harbour & Normanston to 41.9% in Southwold — a gap of 25.2 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

What could help →

opportunity

Connect local skills to local opportunities

27.6% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in East Suffolk council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 11.9% in Melton to 25.8% in Harbour & Normanston — a gap of 13.9 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

What could help →

opportunity

Target safety work where problems repeat

Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in East Suffolk council area.

Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.

What could help →

opportunity

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

What could help →

opportunity

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 9.9% in Rushmere St Andrew to 30.2% in Harbour & Normanston — a gap of 20.3 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

What could help →

Threats

threat

Treat the new completion date as a forecast

The revised design avoids moving water infrastructure and has a later delivery timetable.

Unresolved constraints can extend the wait for promised benefits.

Evidence

What could help →