Local help →Stonham · Mid Suffolk
Stonham electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.
Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Source →The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Source →Formal qualifications are only one part of someone's skills. Training decisions also need current vacancies, employment and residents' experience.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Source →People aged 65 or over
25.1%21 March 2021 · Stonham
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All usual residents
708 out of 2,824.
Source and method →People reporting bad or very bad health
2.8%21 March 2021 · Stonham
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised
80 out of 2,823.
Source and method →People counted in the census
2,82321 March 2021 · Stonham
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All usual residents
2,823 out of 2,823.
Source and method →People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent
38%21 March 2021 · Stonham
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
Residents aged 16 and over
922 out of 2,427.
Source and method →Households facing at least one measured disadvantage
43.2%21 March 2021 · Stonham
The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
512 out of 1,185.
Source and method →Households facing two or more measured disadvantages
9.7%21 March 2021 · Stonham
The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
115 out of 1,185.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market
39%21 March 2021 · Stonham
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
953 out of 2,445.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ in work
59%21 March 2021 · Stonham
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
1,442 out of 2,445.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability
1.3%21 March 2021 · Stonham
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
32 out of 2,445.
Source and method →People aged 16+ with no qualifications
13.4%21 March 2021 · Stonham
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
Residents aged 16 and over
326 out of 2,427.
Source and method →Homes rented privately
16%21 March 2021 · Stonham
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
195 out of 1,189.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ retired
28.3%21 March 2021 · Stonham
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
691 out of 2,445.
Source and method →Homes rented from a council or housing association
5%21 March 2021 · Stonham
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
57 out of 1,189.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ unemployed
2%21 March 2021 · Stonham
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
50 out of 2,445.
Source and method →Police-recorded locations for Stonham ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.
September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 51 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.
Mapped crime over time
Stonham ward · mapped crimes
Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.
Shown on this chart: 10 mapped crimes in September 2024; 6 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.
The line joins consecutive published observations.
Hover or tap the chart for a value. Use the date slider with touch or arrow keys. Escape closes the chart label.
| Month | Mapped crime | Anti-social behaviour |
|---|---|---|
| September 2024 | 10 | 0 |
| October 2024 | 3 | 2 |
| November 2024 | 1 | 0 |
| December 2024 | 3 | 0 |
| January 2025 | 5 | 0 |
| February 2025 | 5 | 0 |
| March 2025 | 1 | 0 |
| April 2025 | 3 | 0 |
| May 2025 | 3 | 0 |
| June 2025 | 4 | 0 |
| July 2025 | 7 | 3 |
| August 2025 | 6 | 0 |
| September 2025 | 12 | 1 |
| October 2025 | 1 | 3 |
| November 2025 | 7 | 0 |
| December 2025 | 14 | 0 |
| January 2026 | 8 | 1 |
| February 2026 | 6 | 1 |
| March 2026 | 7 | 1 |
| April 2026 | 9 | 1 |
| May 2026 | 6 | 0 |
| June 2026 | 7 | 0 |
| July 2026 | 4 | 1 |
| August 2026 | 6 | 0 |
| Category | Mapped crimes |
|---|---|
| violent crime | 39 |
| burglary | 16 |
| public order | 13 |
| other theft | 8 |
| other crime | 4 |
| vehicle crime | 3 |
| criminal damage arson | 2 |
| drugs | 1 |
| shoplifting | 1 |
Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.
Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and unusable locations excluded.
An empty ward count means no mapped rows in the complete required force files; it does not prove that no crime occurred.
These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.
Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.
Police data and method →A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.
No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →
Proposed responses across Mid Suffolk →