Skip to content
Suffolk Counts — Suffolk, in numbers.Local help →

Mid Suffolk, in numbers

Issues and SWOT: Mid Suffolk

Mid Suffolk local authority area. Every figure carries its own date.

Strengths to build on. Pressures to address. Choices to make.

These assessments connect evidence with proposed responses. They are not ratings of council performance.

Strengths

strength

Build on spaces that are already open

The Bull Room was operating when the July investment update was issued.

An open venue can be evaluated through actual use.

Evidence

What could help →

strength

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £1,005 a month (August 2026) in Mid Suffolk council area. This is £454 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 8.1% in Haughley, Stowupland & Wetherden to 24.9% in St Peter's — a gap of 16.9 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

What could help →

strength

Bring support closer to people in poor health

4.2% of people reported bad or very bad health in Mid Suffolk council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.1% in Stow Thorney to 5.7% in Eye — a gap of 3.7 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

What could help →

Weaknesses

weakness

Publish what still has to happen in empty buildings

Further investment in the old fire station and Old Fox Yard was planned.

Announcements need a route to buildings people can enter.

Evidence

What could help →

Opportunities

opportunity

Help smaller premises become easier to use

The new high-street fund includes accessibility improvements.

Small changes can make local shopping more practical.

Evidence

What could help →

opportunity

Plan homes and care around an older population

25.3% of people in Mid Suffolk council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 8.9% in Stow Thorney to 31.9% in Fressingfield — a gap of 23.1 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

What could help →

opportunity

Connect local skills to local opportunities

30% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in Mid Suffolk council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 10.3% in Stow Thorney to 22.4% in Combs Ford — a gap of 12.1 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

What could help →

opportunity

Target safety work where problems repeat

Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in Mid Suffolk council area.

Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.

What could help →

opportunity

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

What could help →

opportunity

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 6.6% in Stow Thorney to 20.1% in Combs Ford — a gap of 13.5 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

What could help →

Threats

threat

Secure upkeep as well as the nature-reserve purchase

Chalkeith had funding towards acquiring land.

A reserve needs continuing management after acquisition.

Evidence

What could help →